Reporting of Multi-Arm Parallel-Group Randomized Trials
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials
R controlled trials, when appropriately designed, conducted, and reported, represent the gold standard in evaluating healthcare interventions. However, randomized trials can yield biased results if they lack methodological rigour.1 To assess a trial accurately, readers of a published report need complete, clear, and transparent information on its methodology and findings. Unfortunately, attempt...
متن کاملThe impact of selection bias in randomized multi-arm parallel group clinical trials
The impact of selection bias on the results of clinical trials has been analyzed extensively for trials of two treatments, yet its impact in multi-arm trials is still unknown. In this paper, we investigate selection bias in multi-arm trials by its impact on the type I error probability. We propose two models for selection bias, so-called biasing policies, that both extend the classic guessing s...
متن کاملKorean translation of the CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials
The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 Statement, updated in March 2010, includes a 25-item checklist and flow diagram. Adherence to this statement is a minimum requirement for the complete, clear, and transparent reporting of randomized trials. We translated the CONSORT 2010 Statement into Korean to promote the widespread adherence to CONSORT in South Korea and to facili...
متن کاملCONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials
The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement is used worldwide to improve the reporting of randomized, controlled trials. Schulz and colleagues describe the latest version, CONSORT 2010, which updates the reporting guideline based on new methodological evidence and accumulating experience.
متن کاملHow do multi-stage, multi-arm trials compare to the traditional two-arm parallel group design – a reanalysis of 4 trials
BACKGROUND To speed up the evaluation of new therapies, the multi-arm, multi-stage trial design was suggested previously by the authors. METHODS In this paper, we evaluate the performance of the two-stage, multi-arm design using four cancer trials conducted at the MRC CTU. The performance of the design at fictitious interim analyses is assessed using a conditional bootstrap approach. RESULT...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: JAMA
سال: 2019
ISSN: 0098-7484
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.3087